Score

1-2

(Below Expectations)

3 – Meets Minimal Expectations 

4-5

(Above Expectations)

Innovation:

• Is this idea unique or improves upon existing ideas with great potential for impact?

• Business/idea is somewhat creative and unique
• Attempts to somewhat fulfill a consumer need not being satisfied

 Clarity:

• Is the information concise, to the point and well organized?

• Attempts to organize content, but it is somewhat difficult to locate key information quickly
• Uses font style/size or text formatting to highlight key information, but they are not used consistently throughout presentation
• Font/background are somewhat visually appealing

Comprehensiveness:

• Did the presenter(s) cover all aspects of the idea? Did they demonstrate a good understanding of the market and knowledge of how operation of the business will work?

• Presentation includes major highlights, but does not fully explain idea
• Includes some irrelevant content  

Feasibility:

• Is the proposed venture realistic? Did the presenter(s) demonstrate this thoroughly through numbers and facts?

• Demonstrates somewhat of an understanding of project requirements
• Prompts some questions about ability to manage and fund the venture
• Somewhat explains numbers and facts, but leaves questions

Professionalism:

• Was the presentation delivered appropriately and were they well prepared?

• Appropriate and detailed language was used 
• The presentation seemed to be rehearsed, but there were still errors
• The presenter(s) appropriately dressed 

“WOW” Factor:

• Was the presentation memorable and unique?

• Overall, the presentation was well organized
• The presentation was solid, but not outstanding

Answering Questions:

• Was the presenter(s) able to answer the questions sufficiently?

• The presenter(s) were able to provide a sufficient answer to the questions asked, but they were still vague

 Total Score