FACILITIES PLANNING COMMITTEE
MINUTES
Members Present: Yassar Ayad; Deb
Fleeger; Steve Hoover; Jack Hubauer;
Others Present:
I.
Approval of Minutes –
1.
A motion was made by
2.
The minutes of the meeting of
·
Ballentine Hall will be included on a list of buildings to be
demolished as an agenda item for a future meeting of the Board of Governors.
3.
Jack Hubauer made a motion
that the minutes of
4.
II. Old Business
1. Venango Projects
·
Pond: The town of
·
Rhoades: The initial job conference has been held and
work will be commencing on that project.
·
Suhr Windows: The
contracts for the project are in the process of being signed.
·
Stairs: The possibility of including construction of
the stairs as part of the work to be completed by the contractor who is working
on Phase 2 of the apartment buildings is being explored. The crosswalk has been approved by Penndot.
2.
·
Drawings were
submitted on February 15th to estimators for the architect and an independent
firm engaged by the University.
·
Final design is
to be delivered to DGS by March 15.
·
An independent
firm will review these plans to assure that the drawings and written
specifications are properly coordinated and compatible. This project includes 325 drawings and a
check like this is essential. The same
type review was done for the library and recreation center projects.
·
With the present
schedule it is expected that construction will occur in late fall. The project is presently 5 months behind the
original schedule, about the same delay experienced in the library project.
4.
One Stop Shopping
·
Dave Tomeo indicated that a group had met as a first time
attempt to get discussions started on the concept and to look at various ideas
and models.
·
Methods for
securing input from students on their needs were discussed.
·
A virtual one
stop shopping web site developed by
5.
Energy Conference
·
The conference
has been scheduled for Saturday, April 8.
·
John Boecker from L.
Robert Kimball & Associates has been engaged as the keynote speaker funded
by a science department grant.
·
There will be a
general session and several break-out meetings for more detailed discussion for
particular subjects.
·
Vendors will be
setting up displays
·
Content to be
aimed more toward corporate/industrial entities rather than residential issues.
III. New Business
1.
Parking
·
Ø
Construction of new
Ø
The plan was developed with the following priorities
in mind:
1.
Treat employees
and commuter students equally according to their needs.
2.
Minimize the
number of students who are forced to park at the stadium.
3.
Avoid assigning
commuter students to small lots.
Ø
Lots were checked during peak hours to determine the
parking needs of each group (commuters, residents, employees).
Ø
Ralston will be going off line next year, which
affects the distribution of spaces between commuters and employees.
Ø
Factoring in the closing of Ralston as a residence
hall, lots assignments were adjusted so that there should be enough parking for
employees, commuter students, and resident students.
Ø
Residence Hall students face the largest reduction in
parking, going from 367 spaces to 271 spaces, a reduction of 96 spaces.
Ø
Despite there being enough parking for employees,
commuters, and residents, the elimination of the Peirce
Lot without any replacement parking will result in little, if any, space for
visiting groups, meetings, conferences, and large athletic events that are
scheduled during the week when classes are in session.
Ø
The plan was reviewed and endorsed by the Parking
Committee
·
A campus map was
distributed which illustrated new proposed lot assignments. The lot behind
·
The committee had
the following comments:
Ø
Part of the Peirce lot has
always been used for handicapped parking for events in Tippin. How will this need
be addressed?
Ø
Could a lot be constructed in lots behind
·
A following
motion was made by
·
Discussion was
introduced regarding the possibility of converting the use of the basketball
courts, volley ball court and hockey rink at the end of the Carrier lot to
parking. Since two areas are already
paved and the other area, volley ball court, could easily be tarred and
chipped, the cost would be low, approximately $15,000, to acquire 130
spaces. The plan has been discussed with
Student Affairs personnel and it was felt the loss of the recreational use
would not be a problem if the basket ball courts could be retained by moving
them to the back of the hockey rink area.
Ø
When a suggestion was made to use these areas for parking
a few years ago, the idea was vetoed because of intramural use of the
areas. This is not as vital now with
courts being available in the new rec center.
Ø
A suggestion was made that a gravel parking lot could
be constructed in the Ralston flats area which would be more convenient for the
other side of campus. This would be
problematic since that area is being considered as a staging area for both the
Science Technology project and the new dining hall.
·
As an amendment
to the previous motion, a motion was made by Ron Wilshire and seconded by Dave Tomeo to indicate that the Facilities Planning Committee
has serious concerns in relation to parking for special events and would urge
the President’s Executive Council to consider use of existing University property
including the property on
2.
Capital Project
Request
·
3.
Solar Tracking
·
The next meeting is scheduled for March 23. The meeting
adjourned at